The theoretical
foundation for this study was based on Lave and Wenger's (1991) community of
practice and Cavazza's (2008) social media landscape. According to Vygotsky (1978), students and
teachers have a shared responsibility to collaborate and learning becomes a
reciprocal experience for the students and teacher. In today's technology infused classrooms, new
methods of communication are affecting how and where this learning occurs. Educational professionals are having to alter
pedagogical practices and rethink interactions with students and peers. Kim and Baylor (2006) even contend " people may apply the
same social rules and expectations to computers as they do to humans in the
real world. " (p. 571). Participation
in social media communities could lead to mastery of new knowledge and skills.
Lave and Wenger's (1991) community of practice are "groups
of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how
to do it better as they interact regularly" (p. 29). Social media, aligned within a pedagogical
framework, can relate real world experiences for the learner and encourage
interaction on a regular basis. Dulworth
(2008) stated, “Learning from your network can be more powerful than other
types of learning because you are often learning from other people who have
‘been there and done that’" (p. 11).
Gunawardena et al., (2009) also states that social networking expands
knowledge through the practice of making connections with individuals of
interest. Social media tools have the potential to build a sense of community
through communication and sharing.
In addition, Cavazza (2013) described social media as
"an ever-changing complex ecosystem" (para. 3). Different services and tools make up the
social media landscape (see Appendix A).
Social media provides a rich environment for communities of practice to
establish, thrive, and mature. As noted
by Cavazza, the networking, discussion, sharing, and publishing are all part of
the environment that allows social learning to occur. As early as 2007, Polin even described the behavior
of Web-savvy students as users who “create, consume, comment on, and rate Web
material on a regular basis. Most understand, at least intuitively from
experience, the power and value of networks and networking with like-minded or
similarly interested peers” (p. 15).
Using these conceptual frameworks as an overarching model,
this research will address the impact social media (independent variable) has on
the academic performance (dependant variable) of high school students. Using Cavazza's model, four specific areas
within the communities of practice will be addressed: publishing, sharing, networking,
discussing. Other control variables,
like age and gender, will also be evaluated in the analysis of the data.
Appendix
A
References
Cavazza, F. (2013). Social media landscape. Retrieved from http://www.fredcavazza.net/2013/04/17/social-media-landscape-2013/
Dulworth, M. (2008). The connect effect. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16. Retrieved from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/routledge/09523987.html
Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(6), 569-596.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Polin, L. (2007). Teaching the net generation. Threshold, 5(summer), 13-15, 18-19. Retrieved from http://www.ciconline.org/
Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dulworth, M. (2008). The connect effect. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16. Retrieved from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/routledge/09523987.html
Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(6), 569-596.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Polin, L. (2007). Teaching the net generation. Threshold, 5(summer), 13-15, 18-19. Retrieved from http://www.ciconline.org/
Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment